What is socially acceptable behavior? Who defines morals, the right and wrong… Is it created from the thought of change, or is it a manifestation of something that already exists?
Just because if exists, can you justify that it should continue…
Is the familiar argument of who will bell the cat, the only excuse for a lack of change…?
Stepping back for a second, the mere act of not opposing something that is not justifiable should mean you are encouraging it…
Does the argument of relative morality step forward? What is unacceptable to one, maybe ok to the other, and in such a case who decides who is right? Religion is used as an argument, but with so many differences in one religion, and between religions, there has to be some new order…
Or is a lack of order the answer??
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
2 comments:
very carefully penned..diplomatic yet opinionated..lol..i think u r dealing with change on a more broader perspective..i agree yet disagree..the element of change that I think u r talking about,is something that is not a one man task..it needs to set in at large amongst ppl..but then maybe,just maybe it should come from within first..
i do agree that the idea seems large scale..
but it all begins with the thought...and i think the problem begins when most people think since its prevalent is right...
in that case, forget change, even holding your own beliefs become dificult...then i guess, doomsday!LOL
Post a Comment